Skip to main content

Oppo's name will be replaced from Team India's jersey, what will be the new name?

Image
By Mukul kumar

Oppo's name will be replaced from Team India's jersey, what will be the new name?

Oppo's name is going to change soon from the Indian cricket team's jersey. The BCCI has finished the contract with Oppo in only two and a half years instead of 5 years.


According to the information, soon the name of Oppo will be removed from the Indian team's jersey. Now Oppo will be replace by India's company BYJU's.
In fact two and a half years ago, name on Indian team jersey changed to the name of the Chinese mobile company Oppo. For which Oppo gave 10790 millions rupees to the BCCI.
Now Oppo has given all its rights to BYJU's, after it now name on India's jersey will be BYJU's. Now it will have to give about 5500 millions rupees byjus.


Byjus is an Indian online coaching company. Whose annual earnings are around Rs. 2600 millions. Byjus's brand ambassador is Bollywood actor Shahrukh Khan.
According to the information, changing the name of the jersey will not loss to the BCCI. Now the remaining rupees of Oppo will give BYJU'S. There is a possibility of a new name on Team India's jersey in September.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Panama Canal vs. Suez Canal: A Comparative Analysis

By
 The Panama Canal (Central America) and the Suez Canal (Egypt) are two of the world’s most important man-made waterways, each drastically shortening global sea routes. The Panama Canal (opened 15 Aug 1914) connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans across the Isthmus of Panama. The Suez Canal (opened Nov 1869) links the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea across Egypt. By cutting thousands of nautical miles from major shipping lanes, both canals serve as “vital gateways of commerce” for eastern and western trade. For example, the Panama Canal shaves roughly 13,000 km off the sea journey between New York and San Francisco, while the Suez Canal provides the fastest route between Europe and Asia. Historical Background and Construction Timeline Suez Canal: The idea dates to antiquity, but modern construction began under French diplomat Ferdinand de Lesseps . After a concession in 1854, digging started in 1859 and took ten years. The canal was completed August 18, 1869, and fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Indus Valley Civilization: Socioeconomic Structure and Cultural Achievements

By
The Indus Valley Civilization (IVC), also known as the Harappan Civilization, was a Bronze Age urban culture that flourished in the northwestern Indian subcontinent roughly between 2600–1900 BCE. Contemporary with ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, it was remarkable for its expansive geography – from modern Afghanistan through Pakistan into northwest India – making it the most widespread of the early Old World civilizations. First excavated in the 1920s (notably at Harappa and Mohenjo-daro), the IVC pushed back the antiquity of South Asian history by many centuries. Its discovery revealed a highly planned urban society with sophisticated craft industries, extensive trade networks, and an enigmatic script. This article explores two broad themes of the Indus Valley Civilization – its socioeconomic status and its art, culture, and literature – based on current historical and archaeological consensus. Socioeconomic Status in the Indus Valley Civilization Social Structure and Class Hierarch...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dark Side of IMF Loans and Their Impact on Developing Economies

By
In May 2025 the IMF approved fresh aid for Pakistan – a $1.4 billion loan (via its Resilience and Sustainability Facility) and a $1 billion tranche of an existing $7 billion program. While IMF officials hailed Pakistan’s reforms, critics warn this marks “the 24th bailout” of Pakistan since 1958, continuing a debt-and-austerity cycle. Economists note Pakistan already spends roughly 60% of its tax revenue on debt interest, leaving only tiny shares for public welfare. For example, an analysis shows Pakistan spends ≈1.7% of its budget on education and just 0.8% on health. As a Reuters analysis puts it, each bailout has been “a borrowed chip to cover the last round of losses”. Pakistan’s critics – from opposition leaders to ordinary business owners – warn that each IMF deal comes with painful conditions. IMF programs typically force harsh fiscal austerity . In Pakistan this has meant big new taxes and subsidy cuts. Under the 2024 agreement, Islamabad agreed to hike taxes on farm inc...
Post a Comment
Read more