Skip to main content

One Nation, One Election: A Critical Imperative for Electoral Reform in India

By

   India’s democratic strength lies in its vibrant electoral process, but the frequency and fragmentation of elections have raised serious concerns about governance, expenditure, and administrative strain. The idea of "One Nation, One Election" has emerged as a potential solution to streamline the electoral cycle and enhance democratic efficiency. Backed by various expert committees and policy think tanks, this proposal aims to synchronize Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections to ensure political stability, reduce costs, and improve policy continuity. However, it also raises critical constitutional, logistical, and federal challenges that must be carefully examined. 


1. Frequent Elections

India witnesses elections to the Lok Sabha, 28 State Legislative Assemblies, and numerous local bodies at varying intervals. As a result, the nation is perennially in election mode. For example, within a span of two years, major states like Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab, Karnataka, and Madhya Pradesh may go to polls. This disrupts governance in the following ways:

Model Code of Conduct (MCC): It restricts the government from announcing new schemes or launching development projects, thereby stalling policy execution.

Policy Paralysis: Bureaucracy becomes cautious, avoiding any decision that could be construed as politically motivated.

Focus Shift: Ministers and ruling party leaders focus more on campaigning than on governance.

2. Escalating Electoral Expenditure

Election spending has increased exponentially over the years. According to the Centre for Media Studies, the 2019 Lok Sabha elections cost around ₹55,000 crore, making it more expensive than the US elections of 2016. The major concerns include:

Burden on Exchequer: Repeated elections consume significant government funds for EVMs, deployment, and logistics.

Money Power Influence: To manage frequent elections, political parties raise funds through opaque means, increasing the risk of quid pro quo and corruption.

Unequal Playing Field: High costs deter honest candidates, especially independents and smaller parties, from contesting effectively.

3. Administrative and Security Burden

Each election involves deployment of lakhs of personnel and police forces for conducting free and fair polls.

Security Compromise: Forces that could be used for internal security or law-and-order duties are tied up in election duties.

Disruption of Routine Administration: Teachers, government officials, and local administration get diverted to election work, affecting public services like health, education, and welfare delivery.

4. Criminalization of Politics

According to ADR (Association for Democratic Reforms), nearly 43% of MPs elected in 2019 had criminal cases against them.

Root Problem: In absence of timely trials and weak disqualification norms, candidates with criminal backgrounds contest and win elections.

Frequent Elections Encourage Muscle Power: In tightly fought frequent elections, parties prioritize winnability over integrity, fielding candidates with criminal muscle to secure constituencies.

5. Lack of Inner-Party Democracy

Most Indian political parties function as centralized and personality-driven entities. There’s minimal internal transparency or democracy.

Opaque Candidate Selection: Tickets are often distributed based on loyalty or money rather than merit or grassroots work.

No Independent Oversight: The Election Commission has no legal mandate to enforce democratic practices within parties.

Link to Electoral Performance: Non-democratic parties fail to build credible grassroots leadership, often leading to voter disillusionment and electoral volatility.

6. Voter Fatigue and Polarization

When citizens are called to vote repeatedly, it creates exhaustion and apathy.

Turnout Variability: Voter turnout drops in subsequent elections, especially urban areas.

Polarization Risk: Frequent campaigning fosters divisive identity politics, leading to communal or caste-based tensions that harm social harmony and national unity.


 Recommendations of Key Committees (In Detail)

1. Law Commission (170th Report, 1999)

  • Recommended simultaneous elections to reduce cost and administrative effort.
  • Suggested reforms in party funding, such as state funding of recognized political parties, restrictions on anonymous donations, and mandatory auditing.
  • Proposed introducing internal democracy in parties, such as compulsory organizational elections and transparent candidate selection.

2. Election Commission of India (ECI)

  • Favoured ONOE in principle for administrative ease and curbing MCC disruptions.
  • Suggested logistical support like procurement of double the number of EVMs and VVPATs.
  • Emphasized the need for constitutional and legal amendments to fix terms of legislatures uniformly, failing which ONOE would remain impractical.

3. NITI Aayog (Discussion Paper, 2018)

Suggested a phased approach:

Phase 1: Simultaneous elections to Lok Sabha and elections in states whose terms end close to Lok Sabha polls.

Phase 2: Remaining states hold elections mid-term, ensuring only two cycles in 5 years.

  • Recommended constitutional amendments to Articles 83 and 172 to align the terms.
  • Proposed constructive no-confidence motion (as used in Germany) to maintain stability even if the ruling government loses majority.

4. Parliamentary Standing Committee (2015)

  • Supported synchronizing elections in two phases—within the first and mid-point of the five-year term.
  • Suggested use of digital technologies, improved electoral rolls, and increased manpower.
  • Recommended political consensus as a prerequisite for legal amendments.

5. Law Commission (Draft Report, 2018)

  • Endorsed ONOE but acknowledged constitutional hurdles.
  • Suggested changes to:
  • Article 85 & 174: Empowering President/Governor to dissolve House only under certain synchronized conditions.
  • Article 356: Limiting misuse of President’s Rule to disturb electoral cycles.
  • Proposed no-confidence motion only if coupled with an alternative government proposal.


 One Nation - One Election (ONOE): In-depth Analysis

Advantages:

Governance Efficiency

  • Ensures uninterrupted development schemes and policy implementation.
  • Politicians will spend more time on performance than campaigning, leading to accountable governance.


Cost Reduction

  • Reduces total election-related spending drastically, both for government and political parties.
  • Allows reallocation of saved funds to public welfare schemes.


Better Resource Management

  • Uniform planning and deployment of EVMs, security, and administrative staff.
  • Reduces pressure on teachers and bureaucrats during school exams or health drives.


Boost to Voter Turnout

  • Combined elections save time and increase public interest, particularly in rural areas where logistics and awareness are a challenge.
  • Consistency in messaging helps better-informed voting choices.


Challenges:

Federalism Concerns

  • India is a Union of States, not a unitary polity. Forcing simultaneous elections may undermine the autonomy of states.
  • It limits state governments’ ability to dissolve their legislatures prematurely, reducing democratic flexibility.


Logistical Constraints

  • Requires over 20 lakh EVMs and VVPATs, large-scale storage and transportation.
  • Needs sufficient training, infrastructure, and funds for nationwide implementation.


Legal and Constitutional Amendments

Multiple constitutional amendments required:

  • Article 83 & 172: Fixing tenure.
  • Article 356: Reining in misuse of President’s Rule.
  • Representation of People Act, 1951: Amending timelines for elections.

Most amendments will need ratification by at least 50% of states, making it politically difficult.


Political Resistance

  • Regional parties fear loss of identity and national party dominance during joint polls.
  • Coordination among parties across states is hard, especially when coalition dynamics differ from the Centre.


Conclusion

India urgently needs electoral reforms to enhance the credibility, efficiency, and fairness of its democratic process. "One Nation - One Election" addresses many of these issues but is not a magic bullet. Its success depends on:

  • Wide political consensus
  • Careful constitutional engineering
  • Strong administrative capacity

In the interim, partial synchronisation, curbing money power, and reforming political parties internally can offer tangible benefits while keeping the federal spirit intact.


Question:

Examine the need for Electoral Reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to the "One Nation One Election" principle.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

वैद्युत द्विध्रुव की अक्षीय स्तिथि में वैद्युत क्षेत्र की तीव्रता

By Mukul kumar
आज हम वैद्युत द्विध्रुव की अक्षीय स्तिथि में वैद्युत क्षेत्र की तीव्रता ज्ञात करेंगे। वैद्युत द्विध्रुव की अक्षीय स्तिथि में वैद्युत क्षेत्र की तीव्रता “ स्थिरवैद्युतिकी Electrostatics,, कुलाम का नियम Coulomb’s Law, ,   वैद्युत क्षेत्र Electric Field ,, वैद्युत क्षेत्र की तीव्रता Intensity of an Electric Field ,, वैद्युत बल रेखाएँ Electric Lines ofForces ,, किसी बिंदु आवेश के कारण वैद्युतक्षेत्र की तीव्रता Intensity of Electric Field due to a Point-Charge ,, वैद्युत द्विध्रुव तथा वैद्युत द्विध्रुव आघूर्ण Electric Dipole and Electric Dipole Moment ,, वैद्युत द्विध्रुव की अक्षीय स्थिति मे वैद्युत क्षेत्र की तीव्रता Intensity of Electric Field due to Electric Dipole in End-On Position “ “ स्थिर वैद्युतिकी Electrostatics ,, कुलाम का नियम Coulomb’s Law , ,   वैद्युत क्षेत्र Electric Field ,, वैद्युत क्षेत्र की तीव्रता Intensity of an Electric Field ,, वैद्युत बल रेखाएँ Electric Lines ofForces ,, किसी बिंदु आवेश के कारण वैद्युतक्षेत्र की तीव्रता Intensity...
Post a Comment
Read more

Panama Canal vs. Suez Canal: A Comparative Analysis

By
 The Panama Canal (Central America) and the Suez Canal (Egypt) are two of the world’s most important man-made waterways, each drastically shortening global sea routes. The Panama Canal (opened 15 Aug 1914) connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans across the Isthmus of Panama. The Suez Canal (opened Nov 1869) links the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea across Egypt. By cutting thousands of nautical miles from major shipping lanes, both canals serve as “vital gateways of commerce” for eastern and western trade. For example, the Panama Canal shaves roughly 13,000 km off the sea journey between New York and San Francisco, while the Suez Canal provides the fastest route between Europe and Asia. Historical Background and Construction Timeline Suez Canal: The idea dates to antiquity, but modern construction began under French diplomat Ferdinand de Lesseps . After a concession in 1854, digging started in 1859 and took ten years. The canal was completed August 18, 1869, and fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dark Side of IMF Loans and Their Impact on Developing Economies

By
In May 2025 the IMF approved fresh aid for Pakistan – a $1.4 billion loan (via its Resilience and Sustainability Facility) and a $1 billion tranche of an existing $7 billion program. While IMF officials hailed Pakistan’s reforms, critics warn this marks “the 24th bailout” of Pakistan since 1958, continuing a debt-and-austerity cycle. Economists note Pakistan already spends roughly 60% of its tax revenue on debt interest, leaving only tiny shares for public welfare. For example, an analysis shows Pakistan spends ≈1.7% of its budget on education and just 0.8% on health. As a Reuters analysis puts it, each bailout has been “a borrowed chip to cover the last round of losses”. Pakistan’s critics – from opposition leaders to ordinary business owners – warn that each IMF deal comes with painful conditions. IMF programs typically force harsh fiscal austerity . In Pakistan this has meant big new taxes and subsidy cuts. Under the 2024 agreement, Islamabad agreed to hike taxes on farm inc...
Post a Comment
Read more